Comments on: In-Depth Look At The Nate Clements Deal http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2007/03/03/in-depth-look-at-the-nate-clements-deal/ Sports Business, Sports Law, Sports Negotiations, NCAA Rules Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:23:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: I Want to be a Sports Agent » Blog Archive » Going Up: NFL Salaries http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2007/03/03/in-depth-look-at-the-nate-clements-deal/#comment-40048 I Want to be a Sports Agent » Blog Archive » Going Up: NFL Salaries Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:23:29 +0000 http://www.dhpromo.com/blog/?p=360#comment-40048 [...] impact won’t be seen until next off-season, Clements’ signing had an instant impact [In-Depth Look At The Nate Clements Deal]. As the NFL off-season kicked off, the signing of Clements as the richest defensive player in [...] [...] impact won’t be seen until next off-season, Clements’ signing had an instant impact [In-Depth Look At The Nate Clements Deal]. As the NFL off-season kicked off, the signing of Clements as the richest defensive player in [...]

]]> By: I Want to be a Sports Agent » Blog Archive » Plan For Your NFL Client Being Cut http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2007/03/03/in-depth-look-at-the-nate-clements-deal/#comment-21354 I Want to be a Sports Agent » Blog Archive » Plan For Your NFL Client Being Cut Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:31:09 +0000 http://www.dhpromo.com/blog/?p=360#comment-21354 [...] In my In-Depth Look At The Nate Clements Deal (oh wait…it was just a glance), I mentioned that while everyone is flabbergasted by the whopping $80 million deal, only $22 million is guaranteed (jeez…I just said only $22 million).  That does not mean that all players are only getting 1/4 of their salary guaranteed, however.  Take for instance, Adalius Thomas, who just signed a $35 million 5-year contract with New England that has $20 million of it guaranteed!  That’s over half of the contract guaranteed (much more security percentage-wise than Clements). [...] [...] In my In-Depth Look At The Nate Clements Deal (oh wait…it was just a glance), I mentioned that while everyone is flabbergasted by the whopping $80 million deal, only $22 million is guaranteed (jeez…I just said only $22 million).  That does not mean that all players are only getting 1/4 of their salary guaranteed, however.  Take for instance, Adalius Thomas, who just signed a $35 million 5-year contract with New England that has $20 million of it guaranteed!  That’s over half of the contract guaranteed (much more security percentage-wise than Clements). [...]

]]> By: Darren http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2007/03/03/in-depth-look-at-the-nate-clements-deal/#comment-21353 Darren Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:28:09 +0000 http://www.dhpromo.com/blog/?p=360#comment-21353 If the Raiders give Jerry any money when he turns 59, he will be a very lucky man. If the Raiders give Jerry any money when he turns 59, he will be a very lucky man.

]]> By: Tim Ryan http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2007/03/03/in-depth-look-at-the-nate-clements-deal/#comment-21328 Tim Ryan Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:34:21 +0000 http://www.dhpromo.com/blog/?p=360#comment-21328 I always find it hilarious when, in particular, the retardedly unfunny SportsCenter anchors make such a big deal out of the total contract money while rarely stating that it will never be fully paid out. Jerry Rice signed a RIDICULOUS 6-year deal with the Raiders when he was 59 years old. He was waived after three seasons, only seeing a fraction of the announced contract money. I always find it hilarious when, in particular, the retardedly unfunny SportsCenter anchors make such a big deal out of the total contract money while rarely stating that it will never be fully paid out.

Jerry Rice signed a RIDICULOUS 6-year deal with the Raiders when he was 59 years old. He was waived after three seasons, only seeing a fraction of the announced contract money.

]]> By: Bo http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2007/03/03/in-depth-look-at-the-nate-clements-deal/#comment-21038 Bo Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:00:17 +0000 http://www.dhpromo.com/blog/?p=360#comment-21038 This isn't really so much of an in-depth look as it is, well... umm... a glance? This isn’t really so much of an in-depth look as it is, well… umm… a glance?

]]>