<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Stracka.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2008/02/25/review-of-strackacom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2008/02/25/review-of-strackacom/</link>
	<description>Sports Business, Sports Law, Sports Negotiations, NCAA Rules</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Questionable Marketing Tactics By Golf Social Network: Stracka.com</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2008/02/25/review-of-strackacom/#comment-69198</link>
		<dc:creator>Questionable Marketing Tactics By Golf Social Network: Stracka.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsagentblog.com/?p=1037#comment-69198</guid>
		<description>[...] Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Heitner</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2008/02/25/review-of-strackacom/#comment-66155</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Heitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsagentblog.com/?p=1037#comment-66155</guid>
		<description>All comments are allowed and encouraged.  That being said, spam will be deleted.  The company that paid for the post had people within its confines spamming this comments area with fictitious names to build its site&#039;s credibility.  That type of activity is a waste of space and will not remain on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All comments are allowed and encouraged.  That being said, spam will be deleted.  The company that paid for the post had people within its confines spamming this comments area with fictitious names to build its site&#8217;s credibility.  That type of activity is a waste of space and will not remain on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Heitner</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2008/02/25/review-of-strackacom/#comment-66153</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Heitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsagentblog.com/?p=1037#comment-66153</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me?  I took off comments that were posted by employees at Stracka.com after their employer asked me to take them off.  Sure sounds like censorship...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me?  I took off comments that were posted by employees at Stracka.com after their employer asked me to take them off.  Sure sounds like censorship&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kw</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2008/02/25/review-of-strackacom/#comment-66125</link>
		<dc:creator>kw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsagentblog.com/?p=1037#comment-66125</guid>
		<description>So in other words you&#039;ve decided to censor our thoughts on this piece because you&#039;re being paid?

Sounds a bit iffy Darren, not all of what you deleted was spam.

If we can only post positives about the sponsor and can&#039;t debate about it compared to a similar product what is the point in having a comment section? Or at least put up a disclaimer stating only positive comments will be accepted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in other words you&#8217;ve decided to censor our thoughts on this piece because you&#8217;re being paid?</p>
<p>Sounds a bit iffy Darren, not all of what you deleted was spam.</p>
<p>If we can only post positives about the sponsor and can&#8217;t debate about it compared to a similar product what is the point in having a comment section? Or at least put up a disclaimer stating only positive comments will be accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Heitner</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2008/02/25/review-of-strackacom/#comment-66044</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Heitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsagentblog.com/?p=1037#comment-66044</guid>
		<description>I received an email from an Account Executive at Stracka.com and the spam comments have been taken care of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received an email from an Account Executive at Stracka.com and the spam comments have been taken care of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Wulterkens</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2008/02/25/review-of-strackacom/#comment-66025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wulterkens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsagentblog.com/?p=1037#comment-66025</guid>
		<description>Yeah looks like a great site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah looks like a great site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.050 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 366/370 objects using disk: basic

Served from: sportsagentblog.com @ 2012-02-13 17:42:16 -->
