<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boras Calls Out The Tigers For Being Narrow-Minded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2009/06/22/boras-blames-calls-out-the-tigers-for-being-narrow-minded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2009/06/22/boras-blames-calls-out-the-tigers-for-being-narrow-minded/</link>
	<description>A blog for sports agents: Discussing sports business news, Sports Law, and other interesting sports related material</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DarrenHeitner</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2009/06/22/boras-blames-calls-out-the-tigers-for-being-narrow-minded/comment-page-1/#comment-130917</link>
		<dc:creator>DarrenHeitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsagentblog.com/?p=6034#comment-130917</guid>
		<description>I see a valid argument made by both sides, and as an outsider, I am undecided. Magglio has been a staple of the organization for some time now. Is it right that he gets benched from a small sample size? Especially if it is being done to not have to pay out some big incentives? Then again, a short rest may give Maggs some time to think about changes in technique that will bring his old self back to life.&lt;br /&gt;    As far as Boras is concerned, he is being an advocate for his client. I have no problem with it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a valid argument made by both sides, and as an outsider, I am undecided. Magglio has been a staple of the organization for some time now. Is it right that he gets benched from a small sample size? Especially if it is being done to not have to pay out some big incentives? Then again, a short rest may give Maggs some time to think about changes in technique that will bring his old self back to life.<br />    As far as Boras is concerned, he is being an advocate for his client. I have no problem with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsagentblog.com/2009/06/22/boras-blames-calls-out-the-tigers-for-being-narrow-minded/comment-page-1/#comment-130914</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsagentblog.com/?p=6034#comment-130914</guid>
		<description>I read an article about Boras yesterday and I think he&#039;s absolutely over the line here (to be fair, I don&#039;t much care for Boras anyway). I know that his job is to advocate for his clients and I appreciate his zealous efforts on their behalf, but he has no standing to criticize the way a team is run.  
 
It&#039;s not like they&#039;re shelving Magglio for the season, they&#039;re just sitting him for a while. This has been the practice in baseball for many, many years and incentive-based contract or not, Magglio is being outperformed by several different players who aren&#039;t getting nearly as much playing time as he has been.  
 
I&#039;m a Magglio fan, but right now they have a few guys who can help them win more than Magglio is doing, so I want to see them on the field. I hope Magglio hits all of his numbers, gets the monster contract and so forth, but being a longtime-but-way-underperforming star doesn&#039;t earn anybody at-bats&#8212;performance earn at-bats and right now Mags isn&#039;t producing. 
 
I&#039;m curious to know, as an agent, what is your take on Boras&#039; statements? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article about Boras yesterday and I think he&#039;s absolutely over the line here (to be fair, I don&#039;t much care for Boras anyway). I know that his job is to advocate for his clients and I appreciate his zealous efforts on their behalf, but he has no standing to criticize the way a team is run.  </p>
<p>It&#039;s not like they&#039;re shelving Magglio for the season, they&#039;re just sitting him for a while. This has been the practice in baseball for many, many years and incentive-based contract or not, Magglio is being outperformed by several different players who aren&#039;t getting nearly as much playing time as he has been.  </p>
<p>I&#039;m a Magglio fan, but right now they have a few guys who can help them win more than Magglio is doing, so I want to see them on the field. I hope Magglio hits all of his numbers, gets the monster contract and so forth, but being a longtime-but-way-underperforming star doesn&#039;t earn anybody at-bats&mdash;performance earn at-bats and right now Mags isn&#039;t producing. </p>
<p>I&#039;m curious to know, as an agent, what is your take on Boras&#039; statements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
